The gains for the 5800X3D are incredible as we're looking at an improvement in 1% lows of up to 53%, with a 43% boost to the average frame rate. Many of you were very excited to see ACC included in the previous benchmark, and yes we'll be including it moving forward.
3440X1440P DEATH STRANDING 1080P
This margin was seen at 1080p and 1440p when looking at the 1% lows, though the game became entirely GPU limited at 4K. Here the new 3D V-Cache model was up to 26% faster, inline with what was seen in Fortnite. The 5800X was certainly very fast, but the 3D version meant 1% lows were kept above 250 fps.Įven at 4K, the 5800X3D was up to 19% faster which is remarkable and although most competitive players target 1080p, or maybe 1440p, I certainly appreciate the boost at 4K as this is where I play Fortnite.Ĭall of Duty Warzone players rocking a Zen 3 processor will see a substantial performance uplift with the 5800X3D when CPU bound. We're looking at even bigger performance gains in Fortnite, here the 5800X3D was up to 27% faster, seen at 1080p and 1440p. An 18% increase for the average frame rate at 1080p and a 24% boost to 1% slows and similar figures were also seen at then the 5800X3D will probably appeal to you. Starting with Valorant, we find a solid performance uplift from the 5800X3D. We've enabled Resizable BAR using the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. This is the fastest memory we can use with the Ryzen 7, while running at a 1:1 ratio with the FCLK. The goal of today's benchmark session will be to measure where the 3D V-Cache boosts gaming performance, and to see if it's worth spending the extra 32-55% on the 5800X3D.īoth AMD CPUs were tested using DDR4-3800 CL16 memory with the MSI X570S Carbon Max WiFi. We're only including the 5800X in this testing, but with a mere 2% frequency advantage over the 5700X, you can safely assume this performance is also achievable with the cheaper Ryzen 7 part. But for today we have AMD's own 5800X, which is now selling for $340, and the new R7 5700X at $290. But what about for those of you who want high-end gaming performance, but aren't interested in paying a premium for the "ultimate" gaming?įrom Intel, the Core i7-12700K is pretty great, and that's the comparison we'll be going for next. So when it comes to "ultimate gaming performance," Intel and AMD are currently tied, but the 5800X3D is far more affordable, more power efficient and easier to cool, making it a more practical solution for a pure-gaming build. You can pair the 12900K with DDR4 memory, but then it will still cost more than the 5800X3D and will be slower.
3440X1440P DEATH STRANDING FULL
When compared to the Core i9-12900K, the 5800X3D is exceptionally good value (at least for gaming), priced almost 30% lower and then you have the memory cost which is significantly less assuming you want to unlock the full potential of the Core i9 part. AMD says $450, so we'll have to go with that for now. This time it's the 5800X3D against its spiritual predecessor, the 5800X, tested across three resolutions using the RTX 3090 Ti.Īs of writing, the 5800X3D has yet to go on sale, so we've still to discover just how many of these things AMD has to sell, and at what price they'll be available.
On the menu today is another 40 game benchmark - actually 41, because we've included one more title in the form of Microsoft Flight Simulator. Still, there were loads of interesting data points and this motivated us to include the original 5800X in a new comparison, allowing us to see where that massive 元 cache can help out. Of course, they traded blows, but overall much of a muchness. We recently compared the new AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and Intel Core i9-12900K flagship head to head in 40 games and found that overall they offer a similar gaming experience.
0 kommentar(er)
